Editorial: Six appeal

[Mark Thompson: in pop music he trusts]
The outcry over the BBC's proposed axing of 6 Music has been futile. Despite DJs like Phill Jupitus quickly branding the plan "a slap in the face to licence-payers" and thousands of music fans adding their tweets to the #saveBBC6Music trend and joining Facebook protest groups, the inevitable was confirmed today.
Mark Thompson, director general of the Beeb, announced the decision as part of his "strategy review" - put simply, an attempt to shake off the persistent allegations from politicians that the corporation is 'bloated' and not delivering value to the licence-payer.
Now we could join the chorus of outrage over the absurd logic whereby Chris Moyles takes home £630k a year to jabber self-importantly over bad music but some of the corporation's most innovative and intelligent digital offerings are deemed surplus to requirments. But we'll leave that to other commentators - and there will be plenty of them. What's more, many of 6 Music's best offerings - such as Gideon Coe's intrepid archive trawling, Adam & Joe's infectious banter or Bob Dylan's themed raspings - have nothing to do with our 'new music' concerns anyway.
No, rather than fan the flames of ire (and despite the fact that it has a mere 700,000 listeners, 6 Music's fans are a vocal, media-savvy bunch), we thought it would be more pertinent to look at a few inconsistencies and imbalances this whole sorry affair spotlights:
• This is a triumph of mainstream majority over alternative minority, but since when does the BBC have to operate by such commercial imperatives anyway? No matter what the MPs say, it's the BBC's unique, non-commercial status that is its most vital quality. Its independence from advertisers breeds diversity, affording air time to unsigned bands or obscure classics on the margins of its scope, instead of wholesale playlisting across the board.
Here on UtR, on the Scotsman website, we are technically one of its online competitors, but while it would be easy to harbour jealousies for the huge resources at their disposal, the last thing we want is to see their commitment to emergent music diminish to nothing.
• As the BBC's coverage of new music shrinks (and at this rate Vic Galloway's show could soon be the only source of underground sounds us Scots get on the BBC), it makes us wonder: why is it that more traditional forms of music get such a good billing, especially in Scotland? Granted, it's native and it's inoffensive and many people love it, but you can hardly turn on BBC2 or Radio Scotland without being regaled by some implausibly cheerful fiddler. While that's perfectly fine in itself, it does seem to us that there's an imbalance here, especially given the vitality of new music in this country right now.
• It has been predicted that if the BBC does retreat from the cutting edge there would at least be a vacuum which could be filled by independent bloggers and podcasters. Again, if this theory proves correct then UtR, a kind of 'mainstream blog', stands to benefit. But we're not convinced by this argument, and as a new band starting out, would you rather tell your mum to turn on the radio or TV to hear your song or download a podcast? There's still a frisson of excitement around being featured on the traditional media that new media has yet to match.
The first draft of this editorial, written before today's announcement, ended on some suggestions for the BBC. Now that they have settled on a provisional course of action, we can only leave you with a (tongue-in-cheek) glimpse of the future for us all.
Have an opinion on this? Let us know below...




15 Comments:
Sound words. But all is not lost, the Trust still have to sign off these proposals and there will be a period of public consultation to come. Will be nearly two years before it closes, so surely time to prove itself?
"Here on UtR, on the Scotsman website, we are technically one of its online competitors."
LOL
Perhaps evilstu, but for the boss to publicly announce this in a published review, it certainly doesn't look promising. It would take serious public or political pressure to sway them off course now. While Twitter and Facebook is bursting with protests, I doubt if man-on-the-street cares much.
Was listening to a phone in a while back. Someone said that Jonathan Ross' and Graham Norton's combined salaries would be enough to run 6Music for a year. Not sure how accurate this is, but public service broadcasting should be about consistency and quality. Not a select few (admittedly popular and big draw) celebs.
Also read a tweet earlier claiming that this could be some sort of concealed warning from the DG: "This is a taste of things to come if you vote the Tories in."
I still think it will go, no matter how many protests it causes. In the meantime, the BBC can sit back and watch listening figures grow massively due to the furore.
Maybe I'm an optimist but I live in hope. Not sure the defeatist attitude is one to take at the minute either Nick.
Do you think if I turned up at MT's door and burst into tears that would make a difference. Probably not but that's how I feel about the whole thing.
I plan to do everything I can and enjoy my favourite station until the axe finally swings.
This is all political chessplay. The tories were going to nail the Beeb over the license fee, giving the odious Murdoch a longer leash on which to spunk his mucky filth, so Thompson et al have jumped before being pushed.
I think more worrying is the manner in which they've decided to axe the Asian Network. If ever there was a total slap in the face for multiculturalism, this is it.
I'm with Stu on this one. It's worth trying to change their minds while the consultation is ongoing - plus signing up to petitions and facebook groups and supporting the station in anyway possible.
BBC Trust chairman Michael Lyons quoted tonight: "If we find that... there's massive public concern that we need to take account of then we will go back to the director general to rethink the strategy before it's approved."
So Milo and Stu, you may yet be proved right...
I wonder how the people who forked out for a DAB radio feel about this. I almost bought one but never got round to it - if I had this would feel doubly frustrating, no doubt.
Perhaps this is the best PR campaign ever?
"Futile?"... "inevitable confirmed"... Certainly not, as I think the consultation may result in the station being saved. I'm actually fairly confident now that 6 Music won't die. One thing is for sure (like much of the BBC), it's too expensive for the return. A reason to re-focus and streamline perhaps, but not to axe it totally.
Whether the BBC carries out the cuts or not (and it's all guesswork for now), the consultation takes about 15 mins to complete, so if you have a strong view either way, here it is:
https://consultations.external.bbc.co.uk/departments/bbc/bbc-strategy-review/consultation/consult_view
And here's one argument for keeping 6 Music:
Radio 3: 2 million weekly listeners, costs £51.1 million
6 Music: 0.7 million weekly listeners, costs £9 million
Whether the BBC carries out the cuts or not (and it's all guesswork for now), the consultation takes about 15 mins to complete, so if you have a strong view either way, here it is:
https://consultations.external.bbc.co.uk/departments/bbc/bbc-strategy-review/consultation/consult_view
And here's one argument for keeping 6 Music:
Radio 3: 2 million weekly listeners, costs £51.1 million
6 Music: 0.7 million weekly listeners, costs £9 million
Similar to what Jim says, I have a renewed sense of optimism over this but we must not sit on our laurels.
If the Trust turn over the recommendations, Mark Thompson will be out of a job, something which I have no objection to.
Well, I am about to not sending my survey as I feel discriminated when the only ethnic "white" options are British/Irish or traveller!!! But then again, keeping 6 music alive is too important...
I am fairly amazed by the amount of folk who are now claiming to be listeners of 6 Music. If a tenth of the folk currently bleating online actually listened to the station on a regular basis it woudln't be facing the chop.
I enjoy Marc Riley and Shaun Keaveny's shows and listen to them most days.
However the rest of the shows aren't very good, the daytime playlists are pretty tough going, and as for the later evening content - I don't really need to hear endless Peel Sessions from 1982, or dumbed down half-hour biographies of bands who deserve much better (the recent skim through Kraftwerk cobbled together by Jarvis being a prime example).
The Peel Sessions which are good (Smiths, Pixies, Pulp spring immediately to mind) are readliy available for purchase elsewhere.
Post a Comment
If you do not have a Google account, you can post a message using the anonymous button
<< Home